Military freefall parachutes
![military freefall parachutes military freefall parachutes](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xkRg2FZX_Ic/maxresdefault.jpg)
Not all of it is relevant to the sport side, as civilians typically don't jump with equipment at night in mass, but the amount of ground training and in air experience far exceeds what is offered in any AFF course. To think that the experience and training a person gets in the military basic parachute course is not applicable at all to the sport side shows a lack of understanding and or short sidedness into what it entails to fly a round canopy safely to the ground be it via the toggles or riser slips.
MILITARY FREEFALL PARACHUTES HOW TO
Failure in understanding how that canopy flies and how to properly land it into the wind(flare) will result in broken bones and or serious injury. The newest static line round canopy, the MC-6, is highly maneuverable and needs to be flown and landed very much like a square canopy. Sun Path Products is a proud member of Complete Parachute Solutions (CPS) a consortium of leading parachute equipment manufacturers working together to produce state-of-the-art military parachute systems and freefall training programs for military and government agencies in the U.S. There are military systems that employ a static line and deploy a square canopy (ie :MC-5, all the newer military systems being sold are capable of static line deployment/configuration as well) that are either in or were in use by certain units. Italy has been credited as the first country to stage a combat jump, which took place in 1918, but the history of the parachute dates back centuries prior to its first military use. Here's something else for everyone to chew on. The history of parachute use in the military dates back to World War I when they were used as a means of escape from various aircraft and observation balloons. Whats a couple dozen static lines going to hurt someone with 400+ freefall jumps? You still need the required freefall time for the other licenses. I am currently working on the edits for both the SIM and IRM, and the S&T Committee will be reviewing changes at the upcoming July Board meeting.ĮTA: I would have figured people would be more upset about them being used for B and C licenses. We will have a new version of the SIM ready sometime in the late summer-early fall. However, it is a bit confusing that the BSRs state that military jumps need not meet the BSRs, therefore the jumps are in compliance with the BSRs.
![military freefall parachutes military freefall parachutes](https://www.mffsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/MFF-Cse-1536x1024.jpg)
Therefore the Committee believes that it is clear in our BSRs that those jumps are being conducted in accordance with the BSRs and should apply towards the total jumps needed for B, C and D licenses as well as awards. The BSR’s state that jumps made under military orders do not need to be made in accordance to the BSR’s. Should they count for USPA awards and licenses?Ī question was posed to S&T as to whether military jumps conducted on military orders should they count for USPA awards and licenses? At issue is the use of round parachutes and exit and opening altitudes at and below 1200 feet AGL. Military jumps conducted on military orders. The Board decided to allow military jumps to count towards jump numbers for licenses and awards, as stated in the minutes back in 2005: We will clean this up in the next version of the SIM so it is a bit clearer.